Summary Liu

What did you like about “The Three Body Problem”

  • fuse science / histoy –> “completely mindblown”
  • 2nd read: “I loved it even more”
  • China, Cultural Revolution, other cultures in video game –> fascinating
  • find out alongside characters –> interesting
  • gigantic scope: China, Earth, Universe
  • Well researched book
  • books made us question things, researching, reading up
  • unexpected twists and turns
  • rooted in history and then extrapolated extremely
  • alien civilisation and clashing political and existential questions
  • lots of effort, impressive
  • needs to be reread
  • China content more interesting for some than the scifi bits
  • reversed trope: Earth & humanity as a haven
  • freedom not guaranteed
  • writing style very precise
  • felt very realistic
  • we want to become badass STEM researchers now too
  • dark parts of science but also humanity
  • What is good? What is evil?
  • What do you do when faced with an unbeatable enemy?
  • quite dystopian: workers in dystopian system also on other planet
  • book 2&3 escalate even more –> unimaginable scope
  • the foe is not a nameless, lovecraftian horror but a society gone wrong
  • Religious faith in the aliens?
  • fighting for Earth?
  • Ecocriticism
  • Forbidden literature –> current issue
  • no limit of imagination
  • Cultural Revolution a new angle
  • within Chinese literature, the book is quite influential –> scifi
  • Charakters not only intellectuals but also normal people
  • Dehydrate! (Doctor Who vibes!)
  • not super action packed but still fascinating
  • main characters and time changesd all the time: jigsaw puzzle fascinating and annoying
  • Ken Liu great translator, needs a shoutout. But: order of story differs, German translation supposedly has more content, more info here: https://www.wired.com/2016/10/wired-book-club-ken-liu-interview/ + https://www.reddit.com/r/books/comments/ueqc7n/talked_with_a_mandarin_speaker_about_the_three/ –> English translation starts with Cultural Revolution, Chinese original has this in the middle but Liu wanted it to be different

What we discussed:

  • being a writer in China is hard, judging the author?: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/06/24/liu-cixins-war-of-the-worlds
  • too science-y for some, “I can’t look up everthing”
  • computer game very different from the rest
  • escalates too much maybe?
  • too many coincidences to be realistic
  • Beginning of book so very different from the ending, vibe changed entirely
  • Trisolarians a bit silly? Why not evacuate earlier?
  • No emotional connection to some characters
  • Villain origin story fun but also…weird?
  • Too many characters?
  • Scope a bit much if you are used to more contained scifi, if you come from “Foundation” or “Expanse” universes, you’re grand

Ratings:

  • 5/10 social score points: not interested in reading the sequels but a unique book
  • 5/5 Chaotic Eras: “2nd reread and I will reread them all again”
  • 4/5 Trisolarians: gonna read the sequels
  • 5/5 jawdropping plottwists: “I was like daaaamn”
  • 4/5 suns: interested in sequels, but could be a bit shorter
  • 4/5 Stars: good but too scifi for me, still entertaining
  • 4/5 too much info dump and science
  • 4/5 solar systems: will read sequels

More recommendations:

Leave a comment